Skip to content

Sunk Cost & Stop Loss

+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| SUNK COST & STOP LOSS |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| 500K didn't buy love, just "accept losing the bet" |
| You might not be a simp, but you might be a Fat Cat |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+

Sunk Cost - Behavioral Economics Foundation of Ponzi

Section titled “Sunk Cost - Behavioral Economics Foundation of Ponzi”

In economic terms, sunk cost refers to past payments that cannot be recovered. It’s irrelevant to future decisions.

“I’ll tell everyone - what I’ve lost, I will definitely get back”

The result is usually sinking deeper. Same with relationships, playing schemes, and running schemes.

Dividend scheme essence:
├── Increase user sunk cost
└── Increase their dreams of APY
Like Fat Cat:
├── Goddess crooks her finger a little
├── He's already planned what to name the children
└── Giving 20 more bucks ≠ Getting one step closer to goddess
Understanding this "pseudo-positive feedback" is crucial

Whether a direction or project can make money has nothing to do with your investment.

RoleDetermining Factors
Retail”Momentum” and “House”
House”Momentum” and “Luck”
Maybe you started as a rational person
When investment is big enough to move yourself
You might confuse cause and effect
Believing your investment determines the thing must work

Common Cases:

  • Linea/ZKS/FT repeatedly PUA, still so many followers
  • Inscriptions are dead, still asking if Rats, Atomical can list on Binance
Community leader operation subsidies paid
Operations center opened
Phuket conference hosted
Almost $2M spent
But daily orders still only ~$5,000
Decreasing every day
Can this project still take off?

The scary thing isn’t failing to take off and not making money. The scary thing is knowing it won’t work but dragging on, draining your resources

Knowing when to stop is essential for scheme operators


Before launching, need clear stop-loss planning:

DimensionContent
Financial investmentMaximum acceptable investment going to zero
Non-financial resourcesPlatform institution insurance, stability costs, post-event settlement costs
Time opportunity costEspecially launching in bull market, how much time waste is acceptable

These three points convert to a total amount and a total duration = Your stop-loss point


Early profits far exceed costs
Harvest before marginal returns diminish
Early profits barely cover costs
Follow-up profits trending down
Counting payout ratio, approaching cost
If trend can't be reversed, close quickly
(Even hard rug if necessary)
Ensure those who must break even are paid back, you don't lose
Still have some money to handle community issues
Exit gracefully
Early profits can't cover costs
Follow-up profits decreasing over time
Close quickly
Don't use unused resources
Those already used that must break even - pay from your pocket
Stop loss, pack up, exit quickly

Schemes Can Be Learned, But More About Wisdom and Heart Training

Section titled “Schemes Can Be Learned, But More About Wisdom and Heart Training”

Three-Ponzi Theory is just methodology for launching schemes, only tells you the framework, what’s clearly wrong to avoid.

AbilityMeaningSource
Reading momentumJudging current narrative trends, market comparative advantagesWisdom (mysterious)
Self-disciplineRecognizing sunk cost essence, willpower to overcome “unwillingness”Trained
EssenceEscaping herd mentality and moral frameworks, finding first principles, cutting noiseSelf-cultivation

The scheme path will be hijacked by political correctness and moral obligations. Without the ability to recognize and hold the essence, you will be drowned by noise


Sunk Cost Trap:
├── More investment → Harder to let go
├── Moving yourself → Confusing cause and effect
└── Knowing it won't work but dragging → Draining resources
Stop-Loss Calculation:
├── Acceptable financial investment going to zero
├── + Non-financial resource value
├── + Time opportunity cost
└── = Total amount + Total duration
Three Scenarios:
├── Exceeding expectations → Harvest before diminishing returns
├── Struggling → Close quickly if trend can't reverse
└── Crash → Stop loss, pack up, exit
Ultimate Direction:
└── Industrialized schemes = Formula-based solution minimizing opportunity cost through minimizing errors

No eternal winners in scheme circles, the scheme path is walking on thin ice

Harvesting hundreds of millions for mansions and models is low probability. Real scheme operators spend most time on the trial-and-error path