Skip to content

ETH's Downfall

+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| ETH DOWNFALL |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| |
| Supply-side: POS removed floor price mechanism |
| Demand-side: No new assets priced in ETH |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+

This cycle’s problems:

Main narrative should be L2 and Restaking
But:
├── L2 ecosystem projects highly overlap with mainnet
├── Can't trigger explosive trading activity
├── PointFi and Restaking lock ETH reducing liquidity
└── Major restaking pricing power at exchanges (USDT denominated)

Compare to last cycle:

  • YFI, CRV, COMP on-chain (ETH denominated)

Without lots of new assets ETH-denominated, users have no reason to hold ETH

ETH's main function: Settlement layer
Major DeFi settlement happens on mainnet
L2 functions highly overlap with mainnet
Lots of demand diverted to L2
Burns are a fraction of before
CycleMacroExternal Demand
Last cycleEasing cycleGrayscale Trust (one-way, only buys)
This cycleTightening cycleETF (two-way, can buy and sell)

ETF Data:

  • One month since launch, total net outflow -140.83K
  • Mostly through Grayscale
  • Old and new whales both cashing out

Miner ETH acquisition cost:
Fixed cost (one-time, non-refundable):
└── ETH mining machine cost
Variable cost (grows over time):
├── Electricity cost
├── Hosting cost (facility, staff, maintenance)
└── Accident cost (penalties, disasters)
Key: Fiat-denominated cost, non-refundable sunk cost

Game theory relationship:

Market price < Acquisition cost (shutdown price)
Miners won't sell
Forms price floor

Mining machine iteration effect:

  • Each generation more expensive
  • Difficulty increases, output decreases
  • Electricity and hosting rise with the tide
  • Total variable cost increases → Raises ETH floor price
Validator cost:
└── Infrastructure (staff, servers)
Staker cost:
├── Staked ETH opportunity cost
└── Validator fees

Key Differences:

DimensionPOWPOS
Unit acquisition costFiat-denominated, highNear zero
Machine obsolescenceHas lifespanInfinite capacity
Shutdown priceExists, supports floorDoesn’t exist
Selling pressureCost constrainedCan dump infinitely

End of 2018 ICO era:
├── Massive ETH-denominated ICO projects dumped chaotically
├── Crashed to below $100
├── No DEX for ETH-denominated exit
├── Projects could only dump for USDT
└── ICO Beta returns plummeted → Davis Double Kill
2018 lessons too painful
Vitalik and Foundation constantly emphasized:
├── Roadmap
├── Main narrative
└── Legitimacy
Formed "core circle" of developers, VCs
DeFi Summer success reinforced institutional rigidity
Chips concentrated in Eth Aligned coordinated actors
"Build for V"
"Orthodox = High valuation"
Split rate too low: Devs and schemes that can capture liquidity plummeted
Market Beta can't beat competitors: High valuations make Beta returns weaker than other chains

ETH problem = Demand-side shrinkage + Supply-side costless selling pressure
Demand-side:
├── No new assets ETH-denominated
├── L2 diverts burn demand
└── ETF allows selling
Supply-side:
├── POS eliminated shutdown price
├── Acquisition cost near zero
└── Infinite mine and dump
Historical lessons:
├── Dividend schemes need fiat-denominated costs
├── Need to continuously raise cost floor
└── If you don't know how, study BTC cost model

  1. Dividend scheme longevity: Form fiat-denominated fixed and variable costs, continuously raise cost floor as liquidity increases

  2. Split scheme reducing selling pressure is only temporary: Real goal is making your mother coin the pricing asset, so holding doesn’t depend on mother coin appreciation


Today’s bomb was planted in 2018