Tabi

+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|                        TABI                                |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                           |
|   The second Ponzi Chain after Berachain                  |
|   Game Chain = Mining Machine Split Scheme                |
|                                                           |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+

Positioning

Nominally, Tabi is a Cosmos-based, VM-agnostic gaming chain

But gaming means schemes. Gaming chain = announcing a new mining machine split scheme

Token Model

Tabi is essentially a Dividend Scheme, with one token $Tabi in three states:

State	Description	Use
$Tabi	Gas token	Basic transactions
veTabi	Locked token	Converted from locked $Tabi or mined, non-tradeable
veTabi (Staked)	Governance	Vote for games, earn protocol revenue and bribery rewards

Deposit-Withdrawal-Payout Model

Macro View

Deposit: User buys $Tabi or mining machine

Revenue/Payout:
├── veTabi → Stake and vote for games
├── Earn $Tabi protocol revenue + project bribery rewards (variable)
└── Payout ratio = Total $TABI output sold / Total $TABI + machine purchases

Withdrawal: User or project sells $TABI

Comparison with Berachain

Dimension	Berachain	Tabi
Core mechanism	Primarily Mutual-Aid	Primarily Dividend
Goal	Maximize liquidity	Increase user sunk cost
Reward source	Definite BGT + fees	Project-provided rewards

Why Tabi Chose Dividend Model

Audience: Gaming projects + gaming participants
        ↓
Gaming is basically dividend schemes
        ↓
Main logic: Increase user sunk cost, promote continuous reinvestment
        ↓
Tabi logic: Hold tokens → Increase staking rate and opportunity cost

Project-User Game Theory

Similar to Berachain, projects must maximize veTABI TVL for maximum returns:

Can only provide more rewards
        +
Continuously launch schemes

But this is a game:

Risk	Result
Too much PUA	Users vote with their feet
Too high payout ratio	Project doesn’t profit

Open Questions

What is the mining mechanism?
How to ensure games fairly share rewards with voting players?
How does Tabi extract value chain-wide beyond gas?

Core Formulas

Tabi essence:
├── Game chain = Mining machine split scheme
├── Primarily dividend + project bribery
└── Designed around user sunk cost

Difference from Berachain:
├── Bera: Definite rewards + mutual-aid logic
└── Tabi: Project rewards + dividend logic

Core game theory:
├── PUA intensity vs user retention
└── Payout ratio vs project profitability

As a Ponzi chain with major VC investment like Berachain, definitely worth continued attention