BSC On-Chain Strategy

+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|                    BSC STRATEGY                            |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                           |
|   Ladder-style gaming market structure                    |
|                                                           |
|   Four.meme -> Alpha -> Futures -> Spot                   |
|   The ultimate gaming ecosystem                           |
|                                                           |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+

1/ Core Competitiveness of On-Chain Gaming

Gaming as an industry has continued for millennia, with growing scale.

Problem: Severe gambling addicts globally only 2%. How to get 98% non-severe addicts to enter?

Why gamble on-chain, not on exchanges?

Demand Type	Appeal
Retail Demand	Small bets for big wins, pursue higher volatility and odds
”Capable Person” Demand	Change rules to gain advantage, from trader to issuer

Both demands unified on “rule diversity”

---

2/ Solana On-Chain Deficiency

Though SOL narrative encompasses everything, 80%+ projects launch through same Pump-style bonding curve:

Same launch mechanism leads to:
├── Same volatility characteristics
├── Same market cap ceiling
├── Same liquidity expansion path
└── Same investment strategies

Essentially, entire SOL is just another “trading rule” CEX, lacks rule-level diversity

Two things Solana did wrong:

1. Encourage massive launchpads to compete with Pump (same ruleset)
2. Bet on XSTOCKS US stocks on-chain (pricing power not on-chain)

---

3/ Binance’s Liquidity Ladder System

Binance constructs complete gaming ecosystem through multiple market rulesets:

Four.meme Free (0-200K MC)
      |
      v
Four.meme Fair (transition)
      |
      v
Binance Alpha (5M-50M MC)
      |
      v
Binance Futures (50-100M MC)
      |
      v
Binance Spot (500M+ MC)

Each ladder provides “exit liquidity expectation” for next level

---

4/ Fair Mode Problems

Community complaints:

• Must KYC with Binance to play
• 4x points causes Free same-name tokens to be diverted
• Internal graduation conditions too harsh
• Can’t effectively prevent bots
• Exclusive ticker 72-hour mechanism

Real Problem: Fair and Free are essentially same thing

Comparison	Fair Mode	Free Mode
Leverage Efficiency	Peak 45x	Peak 55x
Capital Requirement	$54.4K	$19.6K
Entry Barrier	Need KYC	Unlimited

Fair Mode provides worse odds, higher risk, stricter limits, why would users choose?

---

5/ Improvement Plan: Leaderboard Mechanism

Fair mode’s real value is MPC entry: Use BSC money-making effect for wallet user growth

Improvement Suggestions:

Dimension	Plan
Entry Reconstruction	Change to top 100 leaderboard, keep scoring system
Incentive Mechanism	Higher ranking, higher points multiplier
Exit Channel	Alpha/Aster periodically select listings from leaderboard

---

6/ Systemic Logic

Split Model Dimension:
└── Free trenches 10,000+ daily, split rate sufficient

ROI Pressure:
└── No one gives higher liquidity expectation → Prisoner's dilemma

Listing Constraints:
└── Fear can't find leaders, can't give airdrops

Exit Liquidity Expectation:
└── Fair leaderboard explicitly hints at possibility of higher markets

Liquidity Concentration:
└── Alpha points incentivize users to trade stronger ones

Listing Buffer:
└── Binance has time to see if operators have vision

---

7/ BSC Strategic Intent

Binance forming moat at critical junctures:

Layer	Control Point
Wallet	Binance Wallet/MPC controls user entry
Trading	Multiple launchpads, DEX aggregators, on-chain Perp
Pricing	On-chain trading denominated in BNB

Four.meme --> Alpha --> Futures --> Spot
     \                              /
      \______ Same BNB _________/

True ultimate split model and gaming system

---

8/ From Public Chain to Exchange Perspective

Don’t think of BSC as public chain, should reverse:

Think of all public chains as exchanges

Stand in Binance perspective think how to compete with these “exchanges” with/without KYC advantages, different main directions and continuously lead

---

Core Formula

On-Chain Gaming Competitiveness = Rule Diversity × Liquidity Ladder Completeness

Solana Problem:
└── 80% projects same launch mechanism = Lacks rule diversity

Binance System:
├── Four.meme (0-200K)
├── Alpha (5-50M)
├── Futures (50-100M)
└── Spot (500M+)

Fair Mode Improvement:
├── From launchpad to leaderboard
├── Dynamic points multiplier
└── Fill 1-10M market cap gap

---

Whether you’re trader or DEV, need to study hard Shandong learning, fully understand your relative position in system

Next: Deterministic Positives & Buyback Narrative